> At 10:49 PM 11/7/99 -0700, Logan Hall wrote:
> >i have been playing with the style commands on the latest cvs build and
> >the problem i reported as bug 620 seems to have dissapeared. This
> >should be marked as qa to verify fixed. I would do it but im not sure
> >if that would be right and propper of me. also i dont know if i can
> >even do that in bugzilla
>
> Yes, you (or anyone) are encoouraged to move a bug to the "QA to Verify"
> status if you think it should be closed. All I ask is that a brief note is
> written when you do. Just do not take the next step and move the bug from
> "QA to Verify" to "Closed", or else I won't have the chance to do
> regression testing.
>
> Robert Sievers
> Open Source Evangelist
Ok... i added a note to the end of the bug report. Thanks for the info.