Re: Font-bug !!!!

albi (onderste@casema.net)
Mon, 17 May 1999 03:41:28 +0200


On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 03:02:51AM +0200, albi wrote:
> On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 06:39:36PM -0500, Jeff Hostetler wrote:
>
> > could you confirm that those word97 docs load ok on your redhat system ??
>
> I just tried the CVS from 16/05/99 (got them at 22.24 - 22.27 localtime)
> on Redhat 5.2, had to make a ~/fonts with the unix-fonts

Just tried the compiled ones from 16/05/99 which were build on Redhat 5.2
... on SuSE 6.1, I threw in the libstdc++.so.2.8 from Redhat 5.2

(yes, double-checked, SuSE complained about that lib when using
RH-build AbiWord-binary)

and the dynamic and static 16/05/99-CVS ones do both run on SuSE,
although both of them (still) refuse to show the word97-testdoc.

So I think it must be a SuSE-library that's the bottleneck ?

-- 
+++ greetings, Albert +++
In most countries selling harmful things like drugs is punishable.
Then how come people can sell Microsoft software and go unpunished?
(By hasku@rost.abo.fi, Hasse Skrifvars)


This archive was generated by hypermail 1.03b2.