Re: libgsf: very preliminary patch

From: Ryan Pavlik <abiryan_at_ryand.net>
Date: Wed Feb 22 2006 - 07:12:38 CET

Hubert Figuiere wrote:

>Dom Lachowicz wrote:
>
>
>>>1) Check this into HEAD once it's closer to being
>>>ready.
>>>2) Create a branch for this?
>>>3) Maintain a patch set publicly somewhere?
>>>4) Fork AbiWord?
>>>
>>>
>>FWIW, my preferences are presently (in order from most
>>preferable to least preferable):
>>
>>1, 2, 4, 3.
>>
>>I could be convinced of branching and then merging
>>back, provided that the branch was extremely short
>>lived. Like, less than a month.
>>
>>
>
>
>I vote for 1. If it is not in the tree, it won't make it. Look at Marc
>"double-graphics" patch and "reveal codes". They are not in the tree, so
>we don't have them.
>
>The glib dependency is a non issue on MacOS X as we already have it.
>And depending on glib allow to bring enchant :-)
>
>Hub
>
>
>
I would like enchant on Windows, at least preliminarily, I haven't
actually tried to build it. All I know is that the built-in spell
checker makes some strange decisions sometimes.

Ryan

-- 
Ryan Pavlik
AbiWord Win32 Platform Maintainer
www.abisource.com
"Optimism is the father that leads to achievement." - Helen Keller
Received on Wed Feb 22 07:12:41 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 22 2006 - 07:12:41 CET