Re: DEBATE: glib, libgsf in main build.

From: J.M. Maurer <uwog_at_uwog.net>
Date: Thu Oct 20 2005 - 10:21:57 CEST

On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 10:04 -0400, Jody Goldberg wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:31:29AM +0200, Robert Staudinger wrote:
> >
> > On 10/19/05, msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au
> > <msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > If we use glib and libgsf we can considerable functionality. Notabally:
> >
> > While we're at it maybe goffice should be discussed too.
>
> I'd be thrilled to see a libgsf dep go in.

libgsf has my support for abi 2.6. Unless tf comes up with good
arguments not to use it, AbiWord 2.6 will depend on it.

> goffice would be nice
> but it may be simpler to do that in phases. While there is a
> configure time option --without-gtk for goffice, the result is
> somewhat lobotomized. You would be able to render charts, but the
> property dialogs would be gone without more work.

I think we should leave goffice support in plugins for now.

Marc
Received on Thu Oct 20 10:21:35 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 20 2005 - 10:21:35 CEST