Am Montag, den 21.02.2005, 07:40 +0000 schrieb Tomas Frydrych:
> 
> Hi Rob,
> 
> >>1. Just as a reminder: the GTK/GNOME port with its HIG is not the only
> >>port we have.
> > 
> > 
> > Developers should not be limited to the speed of the slowest progressing
> > platform (whichever that may be). Especially in feature coding time.
> 
> This has nothing to do with speed. As a primary Windows user, I do like 
> some aspects of HIG, so of it on usability grounds, some of it because 
> at times it treats the user like an illiterate idiot who does not know 
> what is good for him/her. What matters to me more than what HIG says is 
> the politically correct way of doing this for GNOME is that the win32 
> application feels 'normal' to win32 user. By all means, make the gnome 
> dialogues HIGH compliant, but do not force this on the rest of us.
I see your point.
Of course i didn't intend to break anything.
Please tell me how the menu should be on win32 and i'll hack it. ("like
before" also accepted, of course ;-)
On GTK/GNOME we should strive for consistency and integration IMO.
> > 
> >>2. Controversial things are best discussed on this list first before any
> >>actual changes are made. 
> > 
> > 
> > I think it's better to patch first than make big words. It can be
> > tweaked to fit / reverted anyways. This is HEAD, right?!
> 
> No !!! Global changes to the UI are discussed and negotiated. As Alan 
> pointed out, the menus did not just evolve, there were reasons for 
> things being done as they were. This is not to say there is no scope for 
> change, but it is not for any single person to brute force. Doing it 
> your way, you waste lot of time of lot of people.
I don't see where it wastes time.
Please believe me that i don't intend to do "brute force" but
suggestions. Proposals and screenshots are nice, but for such a thing
it's straight forward to provide a better base for discussion - the
proposed implementation itself.
Best, 
- Rob
Received on Mon Feb 21 09:06:07 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 21 2005 - 09:06:07 CET