Re: Commit (HEAD): Glade-ified tabs dialog (gtk)

Sorry, i used convenience functions introduced in 2.6 without checking.
Will fix ASAP.

- Rob

On Apr 3, 2005 6:26 AM, msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au
<msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
> >
> > CVS:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > CVS: Enter Log. Lines beginning with `CVS:' are removed automatically
> > CVS:
> > CVS: Committing in .
> > CVS:
> > CVS: Modified Files:
> > CVS: unix/ap_UnixDialog_Tab.cpp unix/ap_UnixDialog_Tab.h
> > CVS: xp/ap_Dialog_Tab.cpp xp/ap_Dialog_Tab.h
> > CVS: Added Files:
> > CVS: unix/ap_UnixDialog_Tab.glade
> > CVS:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Glade-ified tab dialog (gtk).
> > This also adds AP_Dialog_Tab::_event_Update(); for auto-apply.
> >
> > Please try it and tell me what you think, i'm not sure if the dialog
> > should expand automatically if there are user-defined tabs or if this
> > should be an internal preference persistent over sessions or something
> > else.
>
> This breaks the build on my Fedora-Core-3 box.
>
> hen mv -f ".deps/ap_UnixDialog_Tab.Tpo" ".deps/ap_UnixDialog_Tab.Po"; else
> rm -f ".deps/ap_UnixDialog_Tab.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
> ../../../../../abi-unstable/src/wp/ap/unix/ap_UnixDialog_Tab.cpp: In
> member function `virtual eTabType AP_UnixDialog_Tab::_gatherAlignment()':
> ../../../../../abi-unstable/src/wp/ap/unix/ap_UnixDialog_Tab.cpp:621:
> error: `gtk_combo_box_get_active_text' undeclared (first use this
> function)
> ../../../../../abi-unstable/src/wp/ap/unix/ap_UnixDialog_Tab.cpp:621:
> error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function
> it appears
> in.)../../../../../abi-unstable/src/wp/ap/unix/ap_UnixDialog_Tab.cpp: In
> member function `virtual eTabLeader AP_UnixDialog_Tab::_gatherLeader()':
> ../../../../../abi-unstable/src/wp/ap/unix/ap_UnixDialog_Tab.cpp:649:
> error: `gtk_combo_box_get_active_text' undeclared (first use this
> function)
>
> I guess this because you are using gtk-2.6? Do we really need this? Can we
> use gtk-2.4 instead?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Martin
>
> >
> > Best,
> > - Rob
> >
>
>
Received on Sun Apr 3 21:09:05 2005