Hi,

I can't speak for the deb spec, but in the rpm spec I _never_ specify
that the filename should be that.

I'm only supporting that filename.

It was discussed a long time ago, that the binary should be called
abiword-2.0 and all the shared stuff should also be -2.0 so that people
could easily have both versions installed.

Rui

On Fri, 2003-05-09 at 12:40, Martin Sevior wrote:
> On 9 May 2003, Marc Maurer wrote:
> 
> > Our binary is not called AbWword-2.0 since I last checked :)
> > 
> 
> Thanks Marc! Is it set to AbiWord-2.0 now?
> 
> Is AbiWord-2.0 the name of our executable as generated by our RPM spec 
> (and debian build system)?
> 
> We gotta get this right!
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Martin
> 
> > 
> > /cvsroot/abidistfiles/GNOME_AbiWord_Control_2_0.server,v  <-- 
> > GNOME_AbiWord_Control_2_0.server
> > new revision: 1.6; previous revision: 1.5
> > done
> > 
> > 
-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html