Re: metadata != props

• Previous message: Paul Rohr: "RFE -- canonical date conversions"
• Maybe in reply to: Paul Rohr: "metadata != props"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 12:12 PM 5/16/02 -0400, Dom Lachowicz wrote:
>Sorry for the minor slip in terminology............ fyi - from just
>about any perspective, metadata is basically properties operating on a
>document level.

Yep. We agree. Metadata are most definitely properties. So are PROPS.

All I'm reminding people is that the generic term "properties" covers two
more precise terms for us. For what I think are good reasons, metadata !=
PROPS in our taxonomy.

For example, I think Martin would like to to be able to use "author" as
PROPS, and so far we've only implemented it as metadata.

Paul,
also being pedantic :-)

• Next message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: metadata != props"
• Previous message: Paul Rohr: "RFE -- canonical date conversions"
• Maybe in reply to: Paul Rohr: "metadata != props"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 16 2002 - 12:40:26 EDT