Subject: Re: recruiting report -- release teams for 0.9.3 packages
From: Scott Rushfeldt (sirushfe@unity.ncsu.edu)
Date: Wed Sep 05 2001 - 13:03:00 CDT
I've volunteered to help test on win32, specifically win 98, if more testers
could be used.
Thanks,
Scott Rushfeldt
NCSU
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Rohr" <paul@abisource.com>
To: <abiword-dev@abisource.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 2:06 AM
Subject: recruiting report -- release teams for 0.9.3 packages
> OK folks, I've got sick kids to deal with, so here's as far as I got on
the
> recruiting front. If 0.9.3 gets held for more than a few days, I may be
> able to help out some more, but no earlier than that.
>
> In the mean time, here's the team of folks who've volunteered so far to
help
> with the release. If you want to see any other 0.9.3 packages released
for
> your platform of choice, you know what to do ...
> Win32 (setup.exe)
> -----------------
> packagers... Nikolaj Brandt Jensen, Tim LaDuca
> testers... Randy Kramer, Alan Keefer
> evangelists... (none)
>
> ** releasable -- we can have clean packages, but nobody will know **
>
> Slackware 8
> -----------
> packagers... JAL
> testers... Michael D. Crawford
> evangelists... (none)
>
> ** releasable -- to evangelize, where do Slackware folks hang out? **
>
> Linux/Intel (various)
> ---------------------
> packagers... Sam TH (Debian), Tim LaDuca
> testers... Alan Keefer (Mandrake 8)
> evangelists... (none)
>
> ** releasable -- I'm utterly unclear on who's building and testing which
> packaging flavors, but that's up to the GNOME & GTK maintainers to
> sort out **
>
> Linux/PPC
> ---------
> packagers... (none)
> testers... (none)
> evangelists... (none)
>
> ** no team, no release **
>
> FreeBSD
> -------
> packagers... (none)
> testers... (none)
> evangelists... (none)
>
> ** no team, no release **
>
> QNX
> ---
> packagers... (none)
> testers... (none)
> evangelists... (none)
>
> ** no team, no release **
>
> BeOS
> ----
> packagers... (none)
> testers... Michael D. Crawford
> evangelists... (none)
>
> ** no release, unless a packager emerges, and the package works
> as advertised **
>
> bottom line
> -----------
> It looks like we're in pretty good shape for 0.9.3 Windows and Slackware
> packages, and I assume that the usual suspects can sort out the "other"
> Linux/Intel packages. I'd love to see other packages created, but so far
> nobody's explicitly stepped up to do the necessary two-step package and
test
> process.
>
> Thus, at this point, we should only expect a few verified 0.9.3 packages.
> If that's not acceptable, now's the time to propose other solutions.
>
> Finally, my apologies if I missed anyone who's already volunteered. If
so,
> please update this thread accordingly.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Paul,
> aka Daddy
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Sep 05 2001 - 12:51:11 CDT