Subject: Re: Lists behaviour
From: Martin Sevior (msevior@mccubbin.ph.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Wed Mar 07 2001 - 01:10:25 CST
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, John L. Clark wrote:
> Man, I'm just racking 'em up, tonight, aren't I?  Ok, here's a couple of
> things about lists.  Sorry about the length.
> 
> First, what happened to solid black bullets?  Now I see small circles as
> bullets.  Seems to me that solid black circular bullets are pretty
> standard.
> 
I put this in deliberately because I want a UCS_BULLET (The unicode value
for a bullet) to be displayed and printed as a bullet. Right now we don't
do this. I hope that with this behaviour up there in in our faces we will
be motivated to fix it.
If it's not fixed near our next release I will change the one line of code
back so we display the bullet encoded in a single byte of the symbol fontset 
as before.
> ======================
> 
> Second, what happened to the auto list ending logic we had?  What I see
> currently is the following (where | represents the curser location, and
> o represents a bullet):
> 
> o	foo
> o	bar
> o	baz|
> 
> Then you hit enter twice and get:
> 
> o	foo
> o	bar
> o	baz
> o
> o	|
> 
> But I thought that instead it was supposed to go from
> 
> o	foo
> o	bar
> o	baz
> o	|
> 
> to
> 
> o	foo
> o	bar
> o	baz
> 
> |
>
This is a bug. It probabally comes from Jesper new code which always puts
a non-zero run in every paragraph. The code I wrote to recognize and empty
paragraph will need to be changed to fix this.
 
> and automagically end the list.
> 
> =============================
> 
> Finally, shouldn't a list look like 
> 
>   o foo
>   o bar
>   o baz
> 
> or
> 
>   1. foo
>   2. bar
>   3. baz
> 
> instead of
> 
> o	foo
> o	bar
> o	baz
> 
> and
> 
> 1.	foo
> 2.	bar
> 3.	baz
> 
> which we currently have now?  Every html renderer that I've seen renders
> a list in the former way, with the bullets indented a bit and then the
> text spaced a bit after that, instead of the bullets at the extreme left
> margin and the text a full tab in from them.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
Well this can certainly be changed if this is the behaviour we want
instead.
Cheers
Martin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Mar 07 2001 - 01:10:44 CST