Subject: XP PS printing (was Re: unix font handling)
From: Leonard Rosenthol (leonardr@lazerware.com)
Date: Tue Jan 30 2001 - 19:31:23 CST
At 12:04 AM +0400 1/31/01, Vlad Harchev wrote:
> I think that XP PS export is not worth the efforts
As the person who originally suggested it, it IS worth the
effort if you look at it as a bridge to "smart PDF documents". By
generating our own Postscript (on ANY platform) we can incorporate
PDFMarks - PS extensions that allow one to specify PDF features to
Distiller/Ghostscript.
> Also, it still would be nice to make AW full supporting TTFs (even with
>non-unicode ttf fonts).
>
Agreed. I believe the latest version of pdfTeX now supports
TTFs and properly writing them out to PS and PDF, so that's probably
a good place to look.
Leonard
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
You've got a SmartFriend in Pennsylvania
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leonard Rosenthol Internet: leonardr@lazerware.com
America Online: MACgician
Web Site: <http://www.lazerware.com/>
FTP Site: <ftp://ftp.lazerware.com/>
PGP Fingerprint: C76E 0497 C459 182D 0C6B AB6B CA10 B4DF 8067 5E65
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Jan 30 2001 - 19:37:32 CST