Subject: Re: Printing question
From: Randy Kramer (rhkramer@fast.net)
Date: Thu Jan 11 2001 - 10:00:24 CST
David Nay wrote:
I like this approach. I can't decide whether
[X] 1,2,3,..,1,2,3,.. [ ] 1,1,..,2,2,..3,...
is an improvement or not. (vs:)
[X] 1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4 [ ] 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4
Just presenting a variation.
Randy Kramer
> > I think MS Word is right - isn't collating meant to
> > collate all the copies of the
> > same page together? (I thought it was originally
> > designed back in the days when
> > generating a page bitmap to send to the printer took
> > a /long/ time, so switching
> > 'collate' on would speed things up for multiple
> > copies, because each page was
> > generated once then printed multiple times, instead
> > of being generated multiple
> > times, once for each copy.)
> >
> > Jamie
> >
>
> Since there is some confusion regarding the definition
> of the term collating, I begin to wonder if our
> "church secretary" would know this term? Perhaps we
> could simplify the dialog box for the end usr by
> removing the word collate. We could replace that
> section of the dialog with:
>
> Printing sequence:
>
> [X] 1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4 [ ] 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4
>
> This would be much easier for everyone to understand.
>
> Dave
>
> =====
> =8-D
> Since I gave up hope, I feel much better.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
> http://photos.yahoo.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Jan 11 2001 - 10:01:49 CST