Subject: peer libraires [was: FAQ -- good XP development practices]
From: Stephane Fritsch (sfritsch@noos.fr)
Date: Tue Aug 21 2001 - 15:19:33 CDT
>So, consider this my introduction to a series of messages where I'll
describe
>the following de facto policies:
[...]
> - adding an XP dependency on a peer library
> - upgrading peer libraries
[...]
I can't wait to read about these topics. I am trying to keep the BeOS
build
in sync but I had many toubles building libiconv. And BeOS isn't the
only
affected platform according to the posts here.
Why are we trying to supply our own Makefiles for peer libraries ? Do
we really need a specific build for these libraries ? The default
building
procedure looks fine to me and it seems to be much more XP than our
makefile. And it just works.
Stephane
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 15:19:34 CDT