Subject: Re: Release 0.9.2 tonight ?
From: Paul Rohr (paul@abisource.com)
Date: Mon Aug 13 2001 - 12:43:03 CDT
At 07:08 PM 8/13/01 +0200, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
>I'd like to attempt to release 0.9.2 tonight. Linux version looks OK.
>What for the other ? (Win32, QNX, BeOS)
I'm just checking mail and won't have time to check Win32, so you'll need to
hear from someone else.
It did at least build for me on Friday, which is better than the previous
tag. It's been a while since we've heard one way or the other on QNX or Be.
You might consider sending private email (or IRC pings) to the maintainers
on those platforms in case they're having trouble keeping up with the flood
of list traffic.
Without Tinderbox, one day is just not a lot of notice for a release, and
I'd be leery of repeating our experience with the last tagged release.
>Unless someone cries, I'll tag 0.9.2 a begin releasing on sourceforge
>prior announcement. 0.9.1 has not really been advertised.
>
>I'm speaking for GMT+2 time.
Dumb question. (I assume I've missed something here.)
If 0.9.1 was uploaded but never announced, is there any need to jump all the
way to 0.9.2 instead of tagging 0.9.1-1 and announcing *that* as 0.9.1?
Given what I see in Bugzilla and the UI, it still feels like 1.0 is more
than a few weeks a way, and I hate to use up all the low version numbers too
quickly. (The thought of weekly release 0.9.27 preceding 1.0 makes me
cringe.)
Paul
motto -- if a tree falls in the forest, and nobody hears it ...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Mon Aug 13 2001 - 12:35:17 CDT