Subject: Re: previews for embedded objects
From: sam th (sam@bur-jud-118-039.rh.uchicago.edu)
Date: Wed Mar 15 2000 - 03:45:24 CST
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Paul Rohr wrote:
> <data>
> <d name=pic.png type=png> ...(base64-encoded PNG)... </d>
> <d name=clip.svg type=xml> <svg>...</svg> </d>
> <d name=name1 type=ole2> ...(unreadable base64-encoded junk)... </d>
> <d name=name1.svg type=xml> <svg>...</svg> </d>
> <d name=eq1 type=xml> <mathml>...</mathml> </d>
> <d name=eq1.svg type=xml> <svg>...</svg> </d>
> </data>
>
To go along with the recent discussion on namespaces, I would like to
chime in on the data segment. Instead of <d ...> <svg> .. </svg></d> what
we want is one of the following two options.
1
<d ...>
<svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/1999/SVG">
<svg:path .../>
...
</svg:svg>
</d>
or 2
<d ...>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/SVG">
<path .../>
</svg?
</d>
These two examples are equivalent as far as the XML spec goes, and expat
will treat them similarly (and I _think_ the user of expat - us - won't be
able to tell the difference). So it's mostly just a preference on our
part.
But we do need to pick one.
sam th
sytobinh@uchicago.edu
http://bur-jud-118-039.rh.uchicago.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE4z1u3t+kM0Mq9M/wRAn/wAKC2EvLNZkXP/uOniPybgY6vlB3phgCgu368
jcxXuQ7iTf4/BlE47aNe9yg=
=6+rS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 03:45:25 CST